Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Reverse Town takes the Hollywood

Tuesday, January 25 · 7:00pm - 9:30pm

4122 Northeast Sandy Boulevard
Portland, OR 97212
(503) 281-4215


The collective with the mostest is having a screening through the help of Grand Detour! The program will run about 2 hours, all filmmakers will be in attendance, the cost is $6. Come on down, have a good ol' time! Here are the films:



"Beautiful Machines" dir. Ian Geronimo, 13:00min, 16mm B&W - 2008

Beautiful Machines is an existential look into the lives of three young Americans, each in their own way searching for soul in the most sterile corners of society.


"Positive" dir. Liz Lewis, 17:59min, Super16mm Color - 2010

When Joanne finds out that she is pregnant she learns that life is not always black and white and the choices we make are not always simple. Joanne and Allan are one couple, and they'll make their choice.

"Rugaru" dir. Michael Roberson, 15:52min, DV Color - 2010

1976...The story of Jeff and Sue, transplanted to New Orleans and
placed in the shadow of the Rougarou. An experimental short about the
beginning of my parents' relationship...

"Saptoads" dir. Michael Roberson, 05:00min, DV Color - 2010

Past and present converge over a lost love.

"52nd Street Laundry" dir. Mario Garza, 08:00min, HD Color - 2010

A late night visit to the laundromat yields some unexpected results
for John Doe.

"Bobby Beats" dir. Liz Lewis, 01:12, Low-Fi Color - 2009

A Jawa edit featuring the kids of "Stairway to Stardom".

"Death Walker" dir. Daniel Klockenkemper, 09:00min, Super 8 Color - 2011

A caregiver notices strange things begin to happen as an old man's
health deteriorates.

"Man of Fury" dir. Brian Lancaster, 20:00min, HD Color - 2009

Having been recently left by his wife, Kelly, a now forlorn father, takes a
less than perfect approach at parenting his repugnant teenage son.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Substitute

Substitute from A. D. Chan on Vimeo.



Hong (Terry Chang) is a repressed ogre living amongst peasants; peering out from beneath his woolen greasy locks toward Joan (Cheryl Miles). When her husband leaves for business, Joan's full lips, tight breasts, tan skin and loquacious legs are left vulnerable and open to this pasty suitor.

The coolness of the camera can be given responsibilty for expressing the words which the narrative does not so easily offer up. Notice Hong's sterile and undefined quarters; cold, green, wearing the same pair of boring shorts the whole film... Contrasted with his first one on one confrontation with Joan, the damp flatness of Hong's identity exists solely in relation to his proximity with Joan. To say masterful is to say too little about Looi Wan Ping's work as Director of Photography.

A.D. Chan's exploration of saturated infatuation doused in thick satin reds and chilling blues is as much a testament to perceived expectation as it is to the magnificence of the image. Each frame is balanced toward a charecters desire to become the object of his desire. The lingering question my mind: does the camera flood the vacant space that our minds fill with thoughts of heterosexual attraction?

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Review of Gillian Robespierre's short film "Chunk"

Gillian Robespierre is a Brooklyn based filmmaker who, from over here on my end of the country, appears to be taking her craft for serious. Filmmaking isn't reducible to a singular craft, because there's no single skill or ability to focus on or perfect to become the competent F I L M M A K E R... It's more like a huge potluck style party thrown together by a few people, and the entire party's success depends on every dish down to weakest one. That's a bad analogy. My point is, even though I've never met Robespierre, I can tell you from my experience that she's the type of artist who is willing to roll her sleeves up and invest herself wholly in her films, because at this level, quality films with good story-lines and believable acting and setting that bring it all to life on the screen- they don't just happen.

Robespierre's film "Chunk," her thesis project at the School of Visual Arts Film & Video Program NYC, is more than just a good film with a good story line and believable acting: it's a funny movie. One that maintains a charming authenticity throughout it's 16 minutes of play. The movie follows Liz, a cynical teen who's been forced to spend the summer at a fat camp by parents who, obviously, think she's fat. She's got a bad attitude about the whole thing, but in the context of a fat camp, and by extension the type of neurotic culture that needs to send it's kids to a place called a fat camp, Liz's attitude strikes me as better than any of the alternatives. In this vein, she wanders the peripheries of the camp, getting into understated shenanigans, including letting a kitchen worker shag her, and buddying up with the camp owner's cigarette smoking outcast daughter. Realistic writing, great sound and editing, and a nice structure in the unfolding of "Chunk's" events; all kept me engaged emotionally when I needed to be.

Films like "Chunk" make a good case for amateur filmmakers to prioritize good story through writing and finding the right actors to deliver on that writing. A superior story with less-than-notable cinematography or image quality will still be accessible to audiences- the opposite isn't always going to be true. The image quality on "Chunk" reminds me of movies I used to shoot on an archaic RCA Video Camera my dad let me use when I was a kid, with those totally-certain-of-themselves video colors, but oh how the stop-motion dinosaur toys did fight. Anyways, despite the washed out, video-color look of the movie, I thought the cinematography was great. It felt natural. My favorite moments for DP Ross McDonnell were at 3:20, as Liz floats face down in the lake, doing her best to look like an overweight drownee, and at 9:28, when we see the kitchen guy's New Balances pressed together so pathetically as he bones Liz.

Robespierre has to be given credit for her knack for putting characters in the right situations so we can learn something about them, and then taking the characters a step further to find some humor in it all. Her two films on Vimeo, "Chunk" and the more recent "Obvious Child," which she co-wrote and directed, present life at those awkward moment's, when it's coming across as a bad joke. The movies' have as their premises concepts I would expect to find trite(snarky teenager in fat camp / unexpected pregnancy leads to abortion clinic first date), but turned my preconceptions around by introducing me to intelligent characters dealing realistically with some of life's many bad jokes. Robespeirre turns these bad jokes funny again, by alternating between just the right doses of harshness and sensitivity in the examination of her protagonists. For me, the films stand apart from so much other amateur movie-making because they pull off that tone- where people cope with weirdness, heaviness, or sadness, by being funny, or in Liz's case, by staying cynical. Afterall, it is pretty effing funny, isn't it? Either way, as a generation so thoroughly laden with cynics, I feel safe in recommending Robspeirre's movies because they achieve a mood many of us can identify with.

But don't take my word for it, watch them yourself.

http://vimeo.com/6459808

Thursday, February 11, 2010

'big picture' film artists

My tastes in film and story stray toward the abstract, the complex, and the combative. These days, I wouldn't trust an artist who was sure of themselves; the modern world as a backdrop demands strands of uncertainty in the cultural narrative, and it's an appreciation of this sentiment that I look for in great contemporary cinema.
In movies like Von Trier's AntiChrist, Noh's Irreversible, the recent Italian film Gomorrah, and western political pieces like Steve McQueen's Hunger, the audience is heavily dosed with gut wrenching absurdity, stern and all the more scary for its realism. These are glimpses of the insanity any sane person has flirted with, human society being what it is.
As the Dalai Lama remarked in Ethics for a New Millennium, "Modern industrial society often strikes me as being like a huge, self-propelled machine. Instead of human beings being in charge, each individual is a tiny, insignificant component with no choice but to move when the machine moves." Indeed, in this climate of collective questioning and general uncertainty, the mythos of the hero not only seems unlikely, it seems irrelevant. (The recent stellar success of novelist and dread monger Cormac McCarthy also sings to this theme.)
The aforementioned film Hunger takes on the complex topic of the 1981 Irish political conflict and subsequent hunger strike. In the narrative, the goals of the characters are subordinated to the extreme deadlock of the ideologies at work. We learn that the prison guards (stand-in representatives for the status quo governing establishment) are not in positions of "real" authority at all, but are in fact slaves to the wills of the activist inmates, mere caregivers and house cleaners, obligated as thus by a petulant and reactionary society. The antagonist prisoners are the true masters in their utter determination to use the system's rigidity against itself. In this world, David does not defeat Goliath in open battle, but instead endures a terrific beating, the punishment of a lifetime, until the onlookers are so disgusted by themselves and the gruesome display their 'civil' society has allowed, that Goliath must heed the public outcry and surrender to societal obligation. The same way the machine forces us to move when it moves, it is forced to stop only if we truly stop (in Hunger, this is exemplified by extreme asceticism).
In a time when leaders are so afraid to speak frankly about the gravity of our predicament that they hide behind hundred year old platitudes about progress; In a time when the dexterity of a rabble of religious clans in the Middle East can sucker the world's most omnipotent empire into it's own drawn out and inevitable defeat, movies like Hunger provide us with the depths of theme we need to make some small sense of reality.
The voices of these filmmakers give hope to those looking for the kind of artistic substance that might save us from ourselves. They show me that even if the machine is impossible to halt completely, its most effective navigators are those who understand its function and are willing to stand up for what they've come to believe, not with the certainty of a fundamentalist, but with the unwavering inquiry of a scientist.
In essence, these films do not prove anything, instead they provide us with some very interesting evidence that, no matter how you look at it, is difficult to refute.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Is There Something Else for Reverse Town?

Half a bottle of bourbon, the sounds of radiohead and aggressive rain on the windows. Is there something else for Reverse Town?

It was our weekend as writers, as imaginary legends. Dan let his beard grow out for the occasion. I prepared a stir fry and we talked about plans to make a movie come spring, but also about the capitalist beast (church of the free market, lethal injection has been privatized in Arizona) bearing down on all that's innocent and good in this country, about the meaning of our creative endeavors, of whiskey and of women.

The autumn turned damn cold that weekend but for all the rain and bluster, the mornings were pure and white and we walked to a coffee shop called the wandering goat and took strolls along the river sipping coffee black and smoking. I complained about the pervasiveness of men who hype without substance to back it up- hype artists, perpetual marketers- how in fact, hype and substance are diametrical opposites in the world of creation, as I see it. He agreed.

Though sometimes, a little bit of self encouragement is good to get the ball moving again. In the end, we'd agreed on alot and were ready to stop talking and get to work.

Friday, August 28, 2009

on working with some old timers...

Walt Curtis is a writer. The peckerneck poet of Portland. He wrote Mala Noche in the late seventies which Gus turned into a feature film, his breakout film. I met Walt for the first time yesterday. He insisted we'd met before-

"Oh yes Geronimo, yes yes, we met before, where was that we met, down at the convention? Oh no, satyricon, oh no, it was your brother that I met yes, must've been your brother. No matter. So Geronimo you've had a calm life? No addictions? Never been in jail? Oh, okay so you've been in jail well I can remember, yes, you're 23, 24? Yes I can remember. Cigarettes and beer at the bar yes I can remember. They don't like me guessin their ages but I tell people anyways, even if I can tell they don't like it. Whoa! This is a funky hotel. I couldn't live here, no, if they kept me here I'd go vomitting across the carpet, ha, oh no, I'm kidding I'm kidding..."

He is sixty eight years old but his soul is younger than mine. If it weren't for his crazy halo of white hair fraying outwards like solar flares from his liver spotted planet of a head he'd be just like the eccentric cats I meet around Portland, young and intelligent and completely insane but in touch with something the average schmoe isn't. I lead him to the hotel room where we're shooting this thing. The ones who lived through the seventies in Portland all cry out (how long has is been!) and hug eachother as I'm entering. John Cambell. Brian Lindstrum. These guys are sort of it as far as the film scene in Portland goes. There are niches sure, but Gus blazed a trail and these guys were his backup; they've built careers off connectivity and mutual support and cross promotion. They talk about Mala Noche and Satyircon and "the lawn," and it's clear that the Portland they're talking about doesn't exist anymore, the election of Reagan was the end of an epoch, we triple exers missed out, no more flipping a downtown hotel room for two bucks a night, no more parties on the lawn, NorthWest has transformed into something else completely.

Walt begins to laugh at his own jokes but quickly stops himself, looking around the room apolegetically. He is quite drunk. His interview goes strangly. Brian keeps looking down to the monitor because Walk keeps dipping his head, eyes closed as he speaks, sometimes building into a crescendo of words and emphatically exploding forward wagging his wrinkled fingers at the camera, making himself an altogether terrible interviewee. I heard someone saying that he was too strongly influenced by Buckowski in his style. And someone else said he hasn't changed a lick in forty years. That he's an alcoholic. That he's the most vicious queer in four states. That he's in the throws of dementia. I admire him. I pity him. But I know it makes no difference. The guy's a fucking poet.

Monday, August 24, 2009

1st of many.

tuesday, the 18th of august, bagdad had their nw filmmakers screening and we were there.

"august" was shown, our first film made as a solidified collective, and it was well received. the program was 2 hours of locally made films--and here in portland it's all about the locally grown. the films included shorts on par with "august", a few up to 20min or so, an animated film, and at least one film shot on 16mm. all different and creatively inspirering.

"august" well was received--a wave of silence reached over the crowd as dan "sexy chest" klockenkemper filled the bagdad's large screen--and we expect to hear back any moment about our first place prize (or at least honrable mention?).